Content Gap Analysis
Content gap analysis ending in a roadmap, not a CSV.
5-competitor intersection in Ahrefs. Every gap labelled by intent. Output is a 6-month roadmap, not a CSV dump.
- Intersection analysis across 5 competitors
- Every gap classified by search intent
- 6-month roadmap with brief outlines, not CSV
Trusted by ambitious brands worldwide
SEMrush agency
Rated #1 SEO agency in The Netherlands by SEMrush
100% Dedicated to SEO
SEO is all we do, and we're good at it
Most agencies export the Ahrefs Content Gap CSV.And hand the client 4,000 rows without ranking.We ship a roadmap with briefs.
Most agencies export the Ahrefs Content Gap CSV. And hand the client 4,000 rows without ranking. We ship a roadmap with briefs.
A real content gap analysis stratifies every missing keyword by search intent, scores it on SERP difficulty against business value, and ends in 30-50 brief outlines slotted into a 6-month publishing roadmap. We use Ahrefs Content Gap, SEMrush Domain vs Domain, Surfer Topical Map, GSC Performance and AlsoAsked together so the gaps you fix actually move revenue, not impressions on info queries that never convert.
See content gap outcomesHow a content gap analysis runs
How a LASEO content gap analysis runs
Five phases over three to four weeks. Output is an editorial roadmap plus 30-50 brief outlines, not a CSV. Then ongoing monthly gap-closure tracking once the roadmap starts shipping.
- 01
Competitor selection + intersection analysis (week 1)
We agree on 5 true competitors with you, not the 5 with the highest DR. Then run Ahrefs Content Gap with intersect-of-3 toggled on, cross-check in SEMrush Domain vs Domain, and pull GSC Performance data for keywords you already rank for but underperform on. Output: a deduplicated candidate list, typically 1,500-3,000 keywords.
- 02
Intent stratification (week 2)
Every candidate keyword is checked against the live SERP for top 10 composition. Tagged informational (guides, definitions), commercial (comparisons, alternatives, reviews) or transactional (pricing, demo, buy). Info-only queries with no commercial path get moved to an awareness-tier queue. Commercial and transactional gaps stay in the priority queue.
- 03
Topical cluster + pillar mapping (week 2-3)
Surviving keywords are grouped into pillar + spoke clusters using Surfer Topical Map and SEMrush Topic Research, validated against AlsoAsked PAA clusters. Each pillar gets 5-8 spokes, each spoke gets an internal link target. Output: a topic graph in Notion or Miro that becomes the single source of truth.
- 04
Prioritised roadmap (week 3)
Every cluster is scored on commercial value, traffic ceiling, SERP difficulty and effort. Top 30-50 briefs are slotted into a 6-month publishing calendar with explicit weekly cadence. Output: an editorial roadmap that names the pillar, the spoke, the writer, the target keyword cluster and the publish week.
- 05
Brief production + monthly gap-closure tracking (ongoing)
Each prioritised gap gets a 2-3 page brief outline: target keyword cluster, recommended H2s, internal links from converting pages, schema, word-count target. After publication we track gap closure monthly in GSC and Ahrefs, surface refresh candidates, and re-rank the next 30 gaps when the SERP shifts.
Gap analysis that ends ina roadmap, not a CSV.
We treat content gap analysis as a prioritisation engine, not a discovery tool. The CSV is the easy part. The hard work is deciding which gaps map to high-margin pages, which are pure information sinks, and which sit in a SERP your domain can realistically enter within two quarters. Every gap that makes the roadmap has a brief outline attached.
What content gap analysis actually means
Content gap analysis, explained honestly
Content gap analysis sits between keyword research and content strategy. Keyword research finds new opportunities in the wider market. Content strategy builds the topic architecture. Gap analysis is the focused, comparative step in between: what your domain is missing compared to a specific competitor set, ranked by what is worth closing first.
Gap analysis vs keyword research
Keyword research is broad and exploratory: what could we target across the whole market? Gap analysis is focused and comparative: what are these 5 competitors ranking for that we are not? Different inputs, different outputs. Most teams need both, but they are not interchangeable, and confusing them usually produces a generic keyword list with no competitive logic behind it.
How many competitors to compare against
Three to five true competitors is the sweet spot. Two is not enough signal; ten introduces too much noise. We define a true competitor as someone selling to your buyer in your geography and price tier, not just a domain with high DR in your category. Then we run Ahrefs Content Gap with intersect-of-3 enabled so a keyword needs to appear in at least three competitor profiles before it counts.
Why intent classification is the real work
An unclassified gap list is dangerous. It mixes high-volume informational queries (which feed traffic but rarely revenue) with low-volume transactional queries (which feed revenue but never enough traffic to look impressive). Marketing teams pick the high-volume info gaps, write 50 blog posts, and wonder why nothing converts. Intent labels prevent that mistake.
Can you DIY a content gap analysis
Yes, if you have an Ahrefs or SEMrush seat and you know what you are looking for. The tooling is straightforward. The judgement work, defining true competitors, stratifying intent, scoring SERP difficulty against business value, is where most DIY efforts fall apart. If your team has the time and the senior judgement, do it in-house. If you do not, hire it out for one or two cycles and then bring it back in once the framework exists.
How often to run a gap analysis
Annually as a baseline, plus before every major content sprint or product launch. SERPs shift quarterly; the gaps that mattered eighteen months ago are not the gaps that matter today. We also re-run the intersection on a single cluster whenever a competitor publishes a major hub on a topic adjacent to your core offering, because that usually means the SERP composition is about to change.
What the output should actually contain
A real content gap deliverable contains five things: a deduplicated candidate list with volumes and KDs, intent labels on every row, a topical cluster map, a prioritised 6-month roadmap, and 30-50 one-page brief outlines for the top gaps. If you only get the CSV, you got the easy 20% of the work. The roadmap and the briefs are where the value is.
.svg?dpl=dpl_CWQqtYRxoJHqsNZT6bRHrFxDdrec)
.svg?dpl=dpl_CWQqtYRxoJHqsNZT6bRHrFxDdrec)
Why LASEO vs alternatives
Content gap analysis compared honestly
DIY with Ahrefs, a typical agency analysis and a LASEO gap engagement all start with the same CSV export. Here is where the work diverges.
CSV export, no prioritisation
- Top 3-5 domains by DR in your category, regardless of whether they actually sell to your buyer.
- None. Every gap shown with volume and KD only. Customer left to guess which queries are info vs commercial.
- Ahrefs Content Gap CSV with 4,000-8,000 rows. Maybe a 2-page summary deck. No briefs.
- Sort by volume descending. Top gaps recommended. No business value scoring.
- Skipped. High-volume gaps recommended even when Wikipedia, Reddit or marketplace giants dominate the top 10.
- One-off deliverable. Re-run next year for another fee.
Prioritised roadmap + briefs
- 5 true competitors agreed with you upfront. Same buyer, same geography, same price tier. Not the highest-DR domains, the most-relevant domains.
- Every row tagged informational, commercial or transactional based on live SERP composition. Info-only queries go to a separate awareness queue.
- Topical cluster map + 6-month editorial roadmap + 30-50 one-page brief outlines. The CSV is one of eight deliverables, not the deliverable.
- Impact-to-effort scoring per gap: commercial value, traffic ceiling, SERP difficulty, effort to produce. Top 30-50 advance to brief stage; the rest deprioritised.
- Manual SERP scan on the top 50 candidates. Gaps where the SERP is locked by Wikipedia, Reddit or category-killers get demoted, even when volume is attractive.
- Monthly gap-closure scorecard tracks which gaps closed. Methodology documented in your Notion so your team can re-run annually without us.
Topical cluster
Related services in this pillar
← Back to pillar: SEO CopywritingContent Strategy
Pillar + spoke topic modelling. Briefs tied to revenue. An editorial calendar we manage, not just hand you in
Blog Writing
Senior SEO writers, brief-driven entity research, internal linking baked in. Not Upwork freelancers churning 8
Content Refresh
Data-driven content refresh. Decay audits in GSC, SERP re-analysis, full re-optimisation. Not just changing th
Content gap analyses at scale
Content gap analyses that closed real revenue gaps
What our content gap clients say
Gap analysis in their own words
Our previous agency sent us an 8,000-row CSV and called it a content strategy. LASEO came back with 38 prioritised brief outlines and an intent label on every gap. Six months later we own the commercial-comparison SERP for our biggest category and our trial signups from organic are up 47%.
The intent stratification alone justified the engagement. We had been writing high-volume info posts that converted nothing. LASEO showed us the commercial gaps our competitors had quietly owned for two years, and gave us a roadmap to close them quarter by quarter.
What I respected most was that they cut 78% of the raw gap list before recommending anything. Most agencies dump the export and let us figure it out. LASEO did the prioritisation work and only recommended 42 gaps. We have shipped 31 of them. 24 are now ranking top 10.
Our previous agency sent us an 8,000-row CSV and called it a content strategy. LASEO came back with 38 prioritised brief outlines and an intent label on every gap. Six months later we own the commercial-comparison SERP for our biggest category and our trial signups from organic are up 47%.
The intent stratification alone justified the engagement. We had been writing high-volume info posts that converted nothing. LASEO showed us the commercial gaps our competitors had quietly owned for two years, and gave us a roadmap to close them quarter by quarter.
What I respected most was that they cut 78% of the raw gap list before recommending anything. Most agencies dump the export and let us figure it out. LASEO did the prioritisation work and only recommended 42 gaps. We have shipped 31 of them. 24 are now ranking top 10.
Honest answers about content gap analysis 
What buyers actually ask before commissioning a content gap analysis.
Keyword research is broad and exploratory: it surfaces opportunities across your whole market regardless of who currently ranks for what. Content gap analysis is focused and comparative: it asks what your specific competitor set ranks for that your domain does not. Keyword research feeds long-term topic planning. Gap analysis feeds short-term competitive catch-up. Most teams need both, run at different cadences. Keyword research happens annually. Gap analysis happens before every major content sprint, product launch or category push. Confusing them produces a generic keyword list with no competitive logic behind it, which is the most common content strategy mistake we encounter when auditing existing programmes.
Content gap strategy call
Bring your gap questionto a senior strategist.
30 minutes with a LASEO senior content strategist. We will not pitch. We will identify the three competitors you should be intersecting against, name the biggest commercial cluster they own that you do not, and tell you whether a full gap analysis is worth the spend right now.
